Current:Home > InvestHow Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court -QuantumFunds
How Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-19 10:08:31
Washington — The Biden administration announced Friday that it will wipe out $39 billion in student debt for more than 800,000 borrowers, relief that comes weeks after the Supreme Court invalidated a separate, broader effort by President Biden to address student loan debt.
Unlike the broad forgiveness Mr. Biden originally attempted to provide, the forthcoming debt discharges by the Department of Education are narrower, stemming from "fixes" announced by the administration in April 2022 to ensure borrowers enrolled in income-driven repayment plans have an accurate count of the number of monthly payments that go toward forgiveness.
The new student debt plan also relies on a different law than the one that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Under the 1965 Higher Education Act and federal regulations, a borrower is eligible for loan forgiveness after making 240 or 300 qualifying monthly payments — roughly 20 or 25 years of payments — on an income-driven repayment plan or standard repayment plan. The administration said "inaccurate payment counts" caused borrowers to lose "hard-earned progress" toward having their loans forgiven, which it has sought to remedy.
Loans covered include Direct Loans or Federal Family Education Loans held by the Department of Education, including Parent PLUS Loans.
The Supreme Court student loan decision
The latest announcement from the Department of Education is part of the Biden administration's efforts to provide relief to Americans with student loan debt, and is different from the program struck down by the Supreme Court late last month.
Under that plan, which the court's conservative majority said is unlawful, eligibility depended on income. Borrowers earning up to $125,000 annually could have up to $10,000 in student debt forgiven. Qualifying Pell Grant recipients, students with the greatest financial need, who met the income threshold could have had up to an additional $10,000 in relief.
That plan by the Biden administration was far more sweeping, with an estimated 40 million Americans eligible for relief, 20 million of whom would have had their loan balances erased.
The program also relied on a different law — the HEROES Act — than the loan discharges announced Friday. The HEROES Act authorizes the education secretary to "waive or modify" student financial assistance programs for borrowers "in connection" with a national emergency, such as the pandemic.
But the Supreme Court disagreed, finding the administration overstepped its authority with its plan to erase $430 billion in student debt.
The court also invoked the so-called "major questions" doctrine in part of its ruling, a legal theory that holds there must be clear congressional authorization for an executive branch agency to decide an issue of "vast economic or political significance."
The "economic and political significance" of the loan forgiveness plan, Roberts wrote, "is staggering by any measure." The court ruled that the education secretary could modify "existing statutory or regulatory provisions" under the Education Act, but "not to rewrite that statute from the ground up."
veryGood! (65)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Powerball winning numbers for September 23: Did anyone win $208 million jackpot?
- Fantasy football Start ‘Em, Sit ‘Em: 16 players to start or sit in Week 4
- LaBrant Family Faces Backlash for Having Daughter Everleigh Dance to Diddy Song
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Tropical Weather Latest: Tropical Storm Helene forms in Caribbean, Tropical Storm John weakens
- Accused drug dealer arrested in killings of 2 confidential police informants, police in Indiana say
- Ohio sheriff deletes online post about Harris supporters and their yard signs after upset
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Tom Parker’s Widow Kelsey Debuts New Romance 2 Years After The Wanted Singer’s Death
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Video game actors’ union calls for strike against ‘League of Legends’
- Savannah Chrisley Shares Heartbreaking Message on Anniversary of Ex-Fiancé Nic Kerdiles’ Death
- Pennsylvania county must tell voters if it counted their mail-in ballot, court rules
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Tom Watson, longtime Associated Press broadcast editor in Kentucky, has died at age 85
- SEC teams gets squeezed out in latest College Football Playoff bracket projection
- Whoopi Goldberg asks for 'a little grace' for Janet Jackson after Kamala Harris comments
Recommendation
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
Park service searches for Yellowstone employee who went missing after summit of Eagle Peak
Sean Diddy Combs and Bodyguard Accused of Rape in New Civil Court Filing
Macklemore dropped from Vegas music festival after controversial comments at pro-Palestine concert
In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
Why does Ozempic cost so much? Senators grilled Novo Nordisk CEO for answers.
The Daily Money: The high cost of campus housing
Department of Justice sues Visa, saying the card issuer monopolizes debit card markets